Enterprise Clinical Analytics

Clinical and financial visibility
across every facility.

Real-time visibility into telehealth utilization, billing performance, call activity, and coding patterns. Turn your remote care operation into measurable operational insight.

Interactive Demo

Enterprise Clinical Analytics for the most innovative PALTC operators

This interactive prototype shows operator-level analytics. Scroll within the dashboard to explore billing metrics, call patterns, ICD code frequency, and revenue breakdowns.

Analytics
May 14, 2026 - May 28, 2026
All facilities · All providers · Last 14 days
Total billing
$6,232.55
Avg. bill
$346.25
Total calls
120
Median call duration
00:12:31
Median wait time
00:04:13

Total calls

Billable, non-billable and unanswered calls

Billable
Non-Billable
Unanswered
024681005/1405/1505/1605/1705/1805/1905/2005/2105/2205/2305/2405/2505/2605/27

Median calls count

Break down per day of the week

MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
Billable
Non-billable
Unanswered

ICD codes frequency

Top recurring ICD codes

R05.1Acute cough
90
E11.9Type 2 diabetes mellitus
60
I10Essential hypertension
60
J06.9Acute upper respiratory infection
60
G47.33Obstructive sleep apnea
29
M54.5Low back pain
29
J02.9Acute pharyngitis
29

Revenues breakdown

Billing codes shares

G0296
$1,168.74
G0270
$790.66
G0316
$702.81
G0423
$478.93
G0446
$447.08
99204
$398.19
99498
$374.42

Provider utilization & coverage gaps

Call volume and unanswered rate by hour

Coverage gap: 2a-4a
Calls
Unanswered %
12a2a4a6a8a10a12p2p4p6p8p10p24030%0%

Case resolution

AI-inferred resolution category

Treated in place
58%
Medications adjusted
22%
Labs/diagnostics ordered
18%
Other new orders received
14%
Transferred
8%

Repeat consultation rate

30-day repeat rate by diagnosis group

Overall: 17%
COPD / respiratory
24%
CHF
19%
UTI / sepsis
17%
Falls / injury
14%
Diabetes
11%

Avg. time to note completion

By provider — operational visibility, not performance judgment

2 providers over 60-min target
Dr. Rivera
18 min
J. Patel, NP
24 min
M. Chen, PA
41 min
Dr. Wallace
1 hr 12 min
A. Singh, NP
2 hr 08 min
Dr. Moreno
6 hr 45 min

Rehospitalization Lens

Correlation view, not causal attribution

Rehosp. rate %
Effectiveness idx
Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 420%10%9060
Rehosp. rate
15.4%
Treat-in-place
58%
After-hours coverage
86%
Repeat consult rate
17%
Methodology note

Data reflects the last 14 days. Resolution categories are AI-inferred from clinical notes and may not reflect official disposition. Rehospitalization correlation is observational, not causal. Provider note timing is for operational awareness, not individual performance evaluation.

AI-Powered Operator Insights

Recommended actions generated from facility, provider, documentation, and quality signals.

Context: All facilities · All providers · Last 14 days
Primary signals
  • 2a-4a unanswered rate is highest
  • Closed-loop follow-up completion: 71%
  • Median provider response: 18 min overall, worse overnight
Supporting systems
Carebrain SBAR timestampsCarebrain call routingPCC follow-up ordersGEHRimed provider notes
Why this matters

Escalation gaps can create unresolved changes in condition and inconsistent provider communication.

Suggested next step

Audit overnight routing and confirm whether follow-up documentation is completed after provider response.

Context: All facilities · All providers · Last 14 days
Primary signals
  • Eligible events: 420
  • Provider encounters: 386
  • Note complete: 354
  • Documentation leakage: 32
  • Estimated recoverable value: $18.6k
Supporting systems
Carebrain encounter and billing statusGEHRimed signed notesGEHRimed claims/coding statusPCC census/payer context
Why this matters

If documentation lags, billing and coding workflows also lag.

Suggested next step

Review providers over the 60-minute note completion target and prioritize note-completion intervention.

Context: All facilities · All providers · Last 14 days
Primary signals
  • Function / GG support: 73%
  • SLP-related conditions: 76%
  • Evidence gaps due in 48h: 11
  • Overall evidence readiness: 84%
Supporting systems
PCC MDS schedule / ARDPCC flowsheets / ADLsPCC care plansGEHRimed diagnoses and notesCarebrain documentation
Why this matters

Missing evidence before the assessment window can create downstream documentation and case-mix risk.

Suggested next step

MDS Coordinator reviews residents due in 48h and requests missing nursing/provider documentation.

Context: All facilities · All providers · Last 14 days
Primary signals
  • Pressure injury score: 69
  • Weight loss / nutrition score: 67
  • Falls / injury score: 72
  • Three review domains flagged
Supporting systems
PCC wounds / skin documentationPCC weights / intakePCC incident reportsCarebrain escalationsGEHRimed provider orders
Why this matters

These domains often require coordinated nursing, provider, therapy, and administrative follow-up.

Suggested next step

Create a QAPI review list and confirm wound/nutrition/fall interventions are documented.

Context: All facilities · All providers · Last 14 days

Change-in-Condition Closed-Loop Rate

From nurse concern to provider response to documented follow-up

100%
Change detected
92%
SBAR sent
86%
Provider responded
78%
Orders / plan
71%
Follow-up completed
64%
Treated in place
Median nurse-to-provider send
6 min
Median provider response
18 min
Follow-up within target
71%
Largest gap: follow-up completion
Sources: Carebrain SBAR + chat, PCC vitals/orders, GEHRimed notes

Provider Visit Coverage & Follow-Up Gaps

Required visits, acute callbacks, and high-risk follow-ups by facility

Network coverage
89%
Open gaps
17
Median response
22 min
Same-day notes
88%
FacilityRequired visitsAcute callbacksHospital-returnHigh-risk reviewsNotes signed
Pine Valley SNF96%91%89%84%94%
Oakridge LTC88%79%76%72%86%
Sunrise Care Center93%87%85%81%90%
Meadowbrook Rehab84%73%69%68%82%
Hillcrest Post Acute91%86%83%78%88%
Sources: PCC census/admissions, GEHRimed visits, Carebrain callbacks

Visit-to-Claim Revenue Integrity

Track leakage from clinical work to submitted claim

Eligible events
420
Provider encounters
386
-34
Note complete
354
-32
Codes captured
332
-22
Claim created
319
-13
Claim submitted
301
-18
Estimated recoverable value:$18.6k
Largest leakage: documentation completion
Sources: Carebrain billing, GEHRimed notes/claims, PCC census/payer · Estimates are for review, not guaranteed recoveries.

MDS / PDPM Evidence Readiness

Documentation support before assessment windows close

84%
Evidence ready
Documentation support score
Primary diagnosis support
94%
NTA comorbidity evidence
82%
SLP-related conditions
76%
Nursing complexity
88%
Function / GG support
73%
Wounds / skin
91%
Special treatments
79%
Medications / high-risk
85%
5-day MDS
8 residents
IPA review
3 residents
Discharge assessment
5 residents
Gaps due in 48h
11
Sources: PCC MDS/flowsheets/care plans, GEHRimed diagnoses/notes, Carebrain documentation

QAPI / Five-Star Early Warning Radar

Leading signals across quality, safety, and care coordination

RehospitalizationFallsPressureInfectionAntipsychoticDischargeWeightChange-in-condition
Rehospitalization
78
Falls / injury
72
Pressure injury
69
Infection / HAI
81
Antipsychotic exposure
74
Discharge to community
76
Weight loss / nutrition
67
Change-in-condition response
84
Needs review:
Pressure injuryWeight loss / nutrition
Sources: PCC MDS/QMs/incidents/wounds/transfers, GEHRimed notes/orders, Carebrain escalations · Not official CMS Five-Star calculation.
Sources: Carebrain SBAR, chat, billing, documentation · PCC census, MDS, flowsheets, incidents, wounds · GEHRimed visits, notes, claims
Context: All facilities · All providers · Last 14 days
1

I-SNP AI Management Insights

Carebrain reviews member, facility, provider, transition, and documentation signals to suggest where the I-SNP team should look next.

Context: All facilities · All providers · Last 14 days
Primary signals
  • 17 members with open transition gaps
  • 9 have medication changes not fully reconciled
  • 6 have hospital PDF diagnoses not reflected in GEHRimed / PCC problem lists
  • 5 have new orders not yet confirmed in PCC
Supporting systems
Hospital PDF summariesPCC orders / MAR / censusGEHRimed diagnoses / notesCarebrain Care Transitions
Why this matters

Executive view: transition gaps raise utilization and quality risk. Clinical manager view: flags hospital-return residents needing reconciliation review. Frontline nurse view: clarifies med / order changes that must be verified before the shift ends.

Suggested next step

Work the reconciliation queue for hospital-return members, starting with medication and new-diagnosis changes.

Context: All facilities · All providers · Last 14 days
Primary signals
  • 12 high-risk members without a recent provider touchpoint
  • 5 have worsening intake or weight trend
  • 4 have repeat respiratory / CHF consults
  • 3 have recent fall or wound documentation
Supporting systems
PCC vitals / intake / weights / incidents / woundsCarebrain consults / SBAR / chatGEHRimed provider visit timestamps
Why this matters

Executive view: proactive touchpoints can reduce avoidable urgent utilization. Clinical manager view: creates a focused rounding list. Frontline nurse view: shows which residents are likely to need provider review soon.

Suggested next step

Build a same-week NP rounding list from the high-risk members with the oldest last-touchpoint dates.

Context: All facilities · All providers · Last 14 days
Primary signals
  • Overall MOC readiness: 91%
  • New-member MOC readiness: 78%
  • 8 HRAs due within 7 days
  • 11 ICP care-plan tasks unresolved · 6 ICT reviews pending
Supporting systems
Carebrain care management tasksPCC census / admission dates / care plansGEHRimed provider notesPlan enrollment file (mock)
Why this matters

Executive view: shows operational execution of the I-SNP care model. Clinical manager view: identifies new-member care-planning gaps. Frontline nurse view: clarifies which resident baseline and care-plan details still need completion.

Suggested next step

Hold a weekly new-member huddle to clear HRA, ICP, and ICT tasks for recent enrollees.

Context: All facilities · All providers · Last 14 days
Primary signals
  • HCC evidence readiness: 82%
  • 14 suspected diagnosis evidence gaps
  • 7 hospital PDF conditions not found in GEHRimed active assessment
  • 5 PCC problem-list mismatches
Supporting systems
Hospital PDF summariesGEHRimed provider notes / diagnosesPCC diagnosis / problem listCarebrain note extraction
Why this matters

Executive view: supports member acuity visibility and documentation integrity. Clinical manager view: prompts provider review of clinically supported conditions. Frontline nurse view: prevents important hospital diagnoses from being missed during transitions. This surfaces documentation gaps for provider review and is not coding advice.

Suggested next step

Route suspected conditions to the provider group for review and confirmation before the next visit.

2

Member Panel & Eligibility Funnel

Track institutional eligibility, enrollment capture, and facility-level panel opportunity

Long-stay residents
412
I-SNP eligible / likely eligible
238
Offered enrollment
211
Enrolled members
184
Active care model
171
At-risk status review
13
77%Panel capture
24New eligible
13At-risk reviews
Oakridge LTCTop opportunity
SourcesPCC censusEnrollment fileCarebrain tasks

Mock data. "Likely eligible" reflects census and facility status, not a final enrollment determination.

3

Model of Care Execution

HRA, individualized care plan, ICT review, medication review, and follow-up completion

91%
MOC ready
HRA completed
94%
Individualized care plan active
91%
ICT review documented
86%
Medication review completed
83%
Post-transition outreach
78%
High-risk member follow-up
74%
78%new-member readiness — recent enrollees may need MOC review
SourcesCarebrainPCCGEHRimedEnrollment file

Care-model execution across HRA, care plan, ICT, medication review, and follow-up. Mock data.

4

Provider Touchpoint & High-Risk Coverage

Proactive NP / provider coverage for members most likely to escalate

47High-risk members
12No touch 7d
4.2Median days
74%Same-week f/u
M. Thompson· Pine Valley SNF
SpO₂ trendWoundPoor intake
Last touchpoint 8dRecommended touchpoint
D. Ramirez· Oakridge LTC
FeverBehaviorRepeat calls
Last touchpoint 6dRecommended touchpoint
L. Washington· Sunrise Care
Weight lossLow intake
Last touchpoint 9dRecommended touchpoint
S. Kowalski· Meadowbrook Rehab
PainFalls risk
Last touchpoint 7dRecommended touchpoint
R. Chen· Hillcrest Post Acute
Respiratory consult
Last touchpoint 5dRecommended touchpoint
SourcesPCCCarebrainGEHRimed

Risk drivers are signals for proactive review, not AI diagnoses.

5

Care Transition Assimilation

Hospital record changes reconciled into PCC, GEHRimed, and Carebrain workflows

Hospital PDF received
38/38100%
Summary generated
38/38100%
Med changes reconciled
29/3876%
Orders confirmed
31/3882%
Diagnoses reviewed
26/3868%
Follow-up scheduled
30/3879%
Care plan updated
24/3863%
Med reconciliation gaps9Diagnosis review gaps12Care plan update gaps14
Hospital PDF signal
Extracted from summary
  • New: Eliquis 5mg BID
  • Dx: Acute CHF exacerbation
  • Follow-up: cardiology recommended
Facility record status
  • MAR updated
  • Problem list pending
  • Follow-up not yet scheduled
SourcesHospital PDFsPCCGEHRimedCarebrain

Diagnosis review gaps appear in hospital summaries but are not yet confirmed in GEHRimed or the PCC active problem list.

6

Treat-in-Place Opportunity

Review avoidable-transfer patterns by condition group, facility, and response pathway

Condition groupTreat-in-place · review
Respiratory / COPD
62%7 review
CHF / fluid status
58%5 review
UTI / infection concern
54%6 review
Falls / injury
49%4 review
Diabetes / glucose
66%2 review
Behavioral health
52%3 review
Respiratory and UTI groups drive the most reviewable transfers
SourcesCarebrainPCCHospital PDFsGEHRimed

"Reviewable transfer" indicates an opportunity for operational review, not certain avoidability.

7

Risk Adjustment Evidence Readiness

Supported diagnosis evidence across hospital records, PCC, and provider documentation

Overall evidence readiness82%
Diabetes complications
91%
CHF / vascular disease
84%
COPD / respiratory disease
79%
Pressure ulcer / wound complexity
76%
Behavioral health
72%
Malnutrition / weight loss
68%
Renal disease
81%
14Suspected evidence gaps
7Hospital-only diagnoses
9Provider review needed
5PCC / GEHRimed mismatch
Hospital PDFPCC problem listGEHRimed noteSupported diagnosis
SourcesHospital PDFsPCCGEHRimedCarebrain

Shows evidence readiness and where provider review is needed — not coding or RAF advice.

8

Medication & Pharmacy Risk Review

Med changes, high-risk medications, reconciliation gaps, and review completion

76%Med rec completed after return
22High-risk meds needing review
6Anticoagulant monitoring gaps
5Antibiotic stop dates missing
8Antipsychotic review needed
4Duplicate therapy flags
Med rec trend76%
SourcesPCCHospital PDFsGEHRimedCarebrain

Items are flagged for review; Carebrain does not make pharmacy decisions.

9

Silent Decline Watchlist

Subtle multi-day changes that may deserve proactive review — a review aid, not a diagnosis

01
87
L. Washington· Sunrise Care
Intake ↓Weight ↓Mobility ↓
Nutrition + nursing review
02
81
M. Thompson· Pine Valley SNF
SpO₂ ↓WoundIntake ↓
NP review within 48h
03
78
D. Ramirez· Oakridge LTC
Temp ↑BehaviorRepeat calls
Care plan check
04
72
S. Kowalski· Meadowbrook Rehab
Pain ↑Falls riskPRN use
Pain reassessment
05
69
R. Chen· Hillcrest Post Acute
Respiratory consultsO₂ trend
Respiratory follow-up
SourcesPCCCarebrainGEHRimedHospital PDFs

A multi-signal trend that may deserve review — not a diagnosis or prediction of decline.

10

I-SNP Program Signal Summary

Transition assimilation gaps: 17New-member MOC readiness needs attention12 high-risk members need provider touchpointHospital-only diagnoses need reviewSilent decline watchlist strongest in 3 facilities
I-SNP source notes
  • • Member panel metrics use mock enrollment and PCC census context.
  • • Transition assimilation compares hospital PDF summaries against PCC, GEHRimed, and Carebrain workflow events.
  • • Risk evidence readiness surfaces documentation gaps for provider review; it is not coding advice.
  • • Silent Decline Watchlist is a multi-signal review aid and not a diagnosis.
  • • Mock data shown for demo purposes.
What You See

Enterprise Command Center

A unified view of your remote care program. Track total billing, call volume, wait times, and per-provider performance across all facilities from a single dashboard.

Key analytics included
  • KPI summary: billing totals, call counts, duration metrics
  • Stacked call volume by billable, non-billable, unanswered
  • Weekly call distribution radar chart
  • Top ICD codes by frequency
  • Revenue breakdown by billing code
For SNF Operators

Move from anecdotal management to measurable insight

Call Activity Visibility

See billable, non-billable, and unanswered calls across your entire operation. Identify patterns and optimize provider coverage.

Billing Performance

Track total billing, average bill per visit, and revenue by billing code. Understand which services drive the most value.

Coding Trends

Monitor ICD code frequency to spot clinical patterns. Ensure documentation captures the full complexity of encounters.

Wait Time Metrics

Monitor median call duration and wait times. Optimize scheduling and ensure timely patient access to care.

Standardized Operations

Enterprise-grade visibility enables consistent protocols and performance benchmarks across all facilities.

Financial Outcomes

Data-driven insight into reimbursement performance helps identify opportunities and improve financial outcomes.

Your operation.
Fully visible.

See how Carebrain gives SNF operators enterprise-grade visibility into their remote care programs.